Saturday, December 13, 2008

Ecotopia


One of my favorite books, Ecotopia, is being reissued by the publisher this month and the New York Times has a nice story about the book.

The story starts with the Pacific Northwest having seceded from the United States to form its' own country named, Ecotopia. Washington, Oregon and Northern California make up the new country and base their economy on sustainable principles. The rest of the remaining US is thrust into a recession driven by partisan politics and old models of industry and energy.

Sound timely? Yes, except that it was written in 1974.

I had the prescient author, Ernest Callenbach, give a talk to a packed house at The Commonwealth Club in May 2005. He is the most charming and delightful man and lives just across the bay in Berkeley.

While you're reading it, be sure to also read the follow up prequel he wrote, entitled, Ecotopia Emerging. In many ways, I like it so much better than the first book.

Labels: , , , ,

Thursday, October 30, 2008

To The Next U.S. President: 100 Words for 100 Days (WorldChanging)

The brilliant minds over at WorldChanging recently called their smartest, most interesting friends they know to answer the following question:

In 100 words or less, what should the next president do in his first 100 days to address the planet's most pressing problems?

I was flattered to be included in that group. The resulting ideas for our next president are astounding. Some highlights:
from Simran Sethi:
Aggressively address climate and energy. Fossil fuel combustion accounts for 80 percent of the rise of CO2 in our atmosphere.

from Jeremy Faludi:
Appoint the following cabinet:
- Amory Lovins, Secretary of Energy
- William McDonough, Secretary of Housing & Urban Development
- Thomas Barnett, Secretary of Defense
- Vinod Khosla, Secretary of Commerce
- Wes Jackson, Secretary of Agriculture
- Bruce Schneier, Secretary of Homeland Security
- Peter Newman, Secretary of Transportation
- Stewart Brand, Secretary of State
- Frank Rijsberman, Secretary of the Interior
- Van Jones, Secretary of Labor
- Dee Hock, Secretary of the Treasury


READ FULL STORY HERE: To The Next U.S. President: 100 Words for 100 Days

My advice?
Our next President must embrace the idea of an inevitable future free of fossil fuels. I propose a call to action similar to the civilian rationing programs of World War II. Back then, it was in the name of "victory" and so our next President must redefine "victory" to mean a sustainable economy free of fossil fuels. The $78 billion of taxes used to subsidize the oil industry will be reapplied to renewable sources instead. Gasoline that is rationed and adjusted for true costs is no match for abundant subsidized solar or wind power.

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, June 24, 2008

NASA Scientist Warns Congress about Warming (again...)

Dr. James E. Hansen is the chief climatologist at NASA and one of the leading experts on Global Warming and the Climate Crisis.

He testified to Congress twenty years ago (June 23, 1988) on the dangers of global warming. This week, he returned to testify again and shared his thoughts on the differences between those two briefings.

An excerpt:
"There are striking similarities between then and now, but one big difference...

The difference is that now we have used up all slack in the schedule for actions needed to defuse the global warming time bomb."


He goes on to write of an ominous foreshadowing for the past 20 years:
"My testimony two decades ago was greeted with skepticism. But while skepticism is the lifeblood of science, it can confuse the public...
The evidence was strong enough that I could say it was time to "stop waffling." I was sure that time would bring the scientific community to a similar consensus, as it has."


And then he proposes a clear plan, something no government official seems able or willing to do:
"The steps needed to halt carbon dioxide growth... Phase out of coal use... Solution of the climate problem requires that we move to carbon-free energy promptly."


Hansen also talks about why things have barely progressed in 20 years of threats:
"Special interests have blocked transition to our renewable energy future. Instead of moving heavily into renewable energies, fossil companies choose to spread doubt about global warming, as tobacco companies discredited the smoking-cancer link. Methods are sophisticated, including disguised funding to shape school textbook discussions.

CEOs of fossil energy companies know what they are doing... In my opinion, these CEOs should be tried for high crimes against humanity and nature."


I love that part!

read the FULL STORY here.

Labels: , , ,

Sunday, April 27, 2008

Bowling 1, Health Care 0

Elizabeth Edwards wrote this wonderful piece (yes, John's wife) in the New York Times today about the election.

A snippet:

Did you, for example, ever know a single fact about Joe Biden’s health care plan? Anything at all? But let me guess, you know Barack Obama’s bowling score. We are choosing a president, the next leader of the free world.


It seems most people are fed up with the way the press handles itself, yet they continue to focus on the insignificant details.

Of the 3000 questions asked of the remaining three presidential candidates, only 8 had to do with the environment or global warming. Over a dozen were asked about Obama not wearing a flag pin in his lapel. That is the problem.

via New York Times

Labels:

Sunday, February 10, 2008

NYT: The Greener Side of Recession


In the New York Times is this item as to whether the environment suffers during hard ecomonic times.

An excerpt:
The environment is actually hurt in hard economic times. Companies will reduce their investments into research and development and green programs...


The Greener Side of Recession

Labels: , ,

HuffPo: Why Economic Stimulus Should Be Green

Why Economic Stimulus Should Be Green

James Boyce has a thought-provoking piece in the Huffington Post on what the government should be doing to protect our environment:

There are hundreds, nay thousands, of examples of politicians talking the talk about the environment, how we need to create green jobs, and green industries, encourage green living, blah, blah, blah, alternative energy is my energy, blah, blah, blah...

Part of the problem with our current economic woes is massive short-term overconsumption.

Part of our environmental problem is massive short-term consumption.

Labels: ,

Saturday, October 20, 2007

A Report from New Orleans


I'm currently in New Orleans speaking at the Traditional Building Conference. It seems an unlikely place for a modernist, I know, but Historic Preservationism is finally starting to make the connection to sustainability. After all, it makes sense. Durability, reuse, preservation of history and culture all fall well within the purview of green building.

This is my first visit to New Orleans, and it has delightfully surprised me. Filled with a rich history and hidden charms, NOLA also offers some interesting lessons. I didn't quite know what to expect here over two years after Hurricane Katrina.


The damage by Hurricane Katrina was devastating, and evidence of it still remains today. Boarded up, wind damaged buildings appear randomly among otherwise undamaged neighborhoods. The difference seems to be the surrounding economy not being able to support repairing these abandoned structures. So they sit, alone, empty and reflecting a weakening of the overall economy. But these examples are only a handful of the real damage.

The subsequent flood was the real cause of the majority of the structural damage, and this ongoing economic damage. It is important to not blame the Hurricane. After all, it was the failure of man-made levies that created the flood. Mother Nature and wind didn't destroy New Orleans, the raging flood waters did. Over 80 percent of the city was flooded, some areas by as much as 15 feet. It all could have been averted, especially in light of the ever-prescient reports on the inadequacy of the levee system.

This failure by our government is the real tragedy. Had the Hurricane been the source of the damage, we could look upon New Orleans as we did when Hurricane Hugo hit Charleston, or Andrew hit Florida.

To the contrary, New Orleans is a living reminder of the mediocrity of our government. Instead of empathy, I feel anger; instead of sadness, I feel disbelief. In addition to the 1,464 people who lost their lives, this incompetence continues 26 months later. A series of scandals including no-bid government contracts, toxic temporary shelters and illicit distribution of recovery money continues to cloud the recovery efforts.

What's left is a shell of the former city. Over half of the downtown storefronts remain closed (* by my estimation, not by any hard data). The streets seem bare and uncrowded, especially along the most touristy areas.


The famed French Quarter was a wonderful surprise. Part of the original plan for the city, the French Quarter is located above sea level (five feet to be exact), allowing it to be spared from the flood. The original settlers had the foresight to locate the original neighborhoods above the line of the inevitable floods. The Industrial Revolution brought the engineering and technology of the levee system, allowing the low lying areas to be filled in. This blind faith in technology is reminds me of the story of Icarus, and dozens of other parables.

The Quarter was surprisingly genuine. To be honest, I expected something as phony as Pier 39 at Fisherman's Wharf, ignored by the locals and filled with gawking tourists buying t-shirts. The empty streets of the French Quarter show a rich history, wonderful lessons of urban scale and a beautiful local vernacular architecture*.

(* A more technical explanation: these older buildings typically consist of deep, wraparound balconies at the second and third floors. These balconies shade the interior and keep the thermal mass of the stone and brick walls cool. Large windows on all sides allow for ventilation and cross-breezes for more cooling. Wooden shutters shade the windows from direct sunlight when needed. These are textbook examples of using an appropriate strategy to design for a hot, humid climate.)

For the most part, the stately homes of both the Garden District and Jefferson Parish today seem undamaged. What is evident is a lack of activity on the streets. While most children were in school (hopefully), I still expected smaller kids playing in the neighborhood.


Within walking distance to the French Quarter was the Lower 9th Ward, a long-time poverty stricken area. It was perhaps hardest hit by the effects of the flood. The streets look shockingly unchanged from the images you saw just after the flood. Most of the homes are abandoned and uninhabitable. A majority are damaged beyond repair. The spray painted tags by the rescue teams sit as an eery reminder of the grim discoveries found inside. The number in the bottom of the X indicates the number of dead found inside.

The remaining residents were unfazed by our presence. Although I felt like an embarrassed voyeur who was trespassing on their tragedy, no one seemed to mind, much less notice. Either they are used to this new kind of tourist, or they simply assumed we're there to help. We stared in silence as we toured the streets, as the sheer amount of the damage is simply overwhelming.

But there are signs of hope. Throughout the city, and across social and economic neighborhoods, you'll find the locals slowly rebuilding their city. Bright and shiny pockets of hope lie scattered amid the ruins. Standing next to a rotting skeleton of a house you'll see a newly renovated one sporting a fresh coat of paint.

The biggest sense of hope comes from the locals themselves, all of whom give a new meaning to the term "Southern Hospitality." Without exaggeration, I can say that every single person with whom we came into contact was friendly, engaging, helpful, polite and just generally grateful of our presence there. Tourism is clearly struggling, and the people of New Orleans are resoundingly determined to change that. Without any sense of being obsequious, the residents are genuinely happy to see visitors. And the best part: it works. I found that I wanted to spend more money, infuse more into the economy. If you're looking for a place to take a trip, NOLA would be a wonderful choice. If you can't travel, order some of Sally's amazing pralines.


New Orleans has long been synonymous with good food, wonderful music and even the legendary corrupt government. The tragedy of the flood is now cemented into that and is inseparable from any experience with this wonderful place.

Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, March 21, 2007

Gore urges Congress to Act, only to meet hypocritcal resistance



Al Gore returned to Capitol Hill to urge Congress to act now to combat Global Warming. He found a heated debate from several dubious Republicans.

Al Gore, at the House hearing: "I promise you, a day will come when our children and grandchildren will ask: What in God's name were they doing? Didn't they see the evidence?"

Although this should not be a partisan issue, several seem set on making it one. This politicizing of the issue might be why some feel Gore might be the wrong spokesman for Global Warming.

As Rep. Joe Barton (R-Texas) said at the hearing: "You're not just off a little. You're totally wrong."

Of course, Barton receives a large portion of his campaign money from big oil and big coal, namely TXU, Anadarko Petroleum, Suez Energy, Reliant Energy, Exxon Mobil and GM. You could say he has a vested interest in increasing carbon emissions.

Gore's Response: "The planet has a fever. If your baby has a fever, you go to the doctor. If the doctor says you need to intervene here, you don't say, 'Well, I read a science fiction novel that tells me it's not a problem.'"

Barton added that Gore's proposed freeze on carbon emissions would mean "no new industry, no new people and no new cars."

Senator James Inhofe (R-Oklahoma) was also a skeptic, debating Gore on the soundness of Global Warming. He cited some dubious reports while ignoring the Peer Reviewed Scientific Report that announced they have "removed the question mark on whether Global Warming is man-made."

Inhofe was the one who famously called global warming the "greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people."

And as expected, Inhofe is also funded by big oil and war mongers, including Murray Energy, Union Pacific, Chevron, BP and Lockheed Martin.

Inhofe was also referred to as the "Dumbest Senator of all."

Many Republicans did turn their opinion. Former House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill. surprised fellow lawmakers by agreeing with Gore's assessment that climate change is a real threat.

It is hard to not politicize Global Warming when so many politicians are being paid to ensure nothing will ever change.

Via AlGore.com



Watch the entire 40 minute talk here

Labels: , ,

Thursday, March 08, 2007

What are our Priorities?

According to the National Priorities Project, the COST OF IRAQ WAR is:
$11 million per hour,
$275 million per day,

TOTAL: $406,592,561,811 and counting

According to The Census Bureau there are 111,162,000 households in the US.

If the average energy efficiency upgrade for a home is $10,000, then we could insulate EVERY HOME in the US in just 10 hours...

...with just the money we spend each day on the war.

We import 13.15 million barrels of oil per day.
By doing these energy efficiency upgrades, we could save 15% of that, or some 2 million barrels a day.

That is more oil than we import from Saudi Arabia (about 1.5 million barrels/day).

Imagine being free of Saudi Arabian oil.

Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, February 20, 2007

A voice of environmental sanity in the White House?

What Are You Doing Here?
He heads Treasury, not the EPA, but Hank Paulson is investing time in making this White House greener.

Paulson is a rare species inside the Bush administration. Environmentalists see this White House as a bastion of backward thinking; Bush has angered them (and America's allies) by sometimes questioning the science of global warming. Yet Paulson cares deeply about climate change: during his seven-year run as chairman and CEO of Goldman Sachs, the investment bank issued a policy paper backing the science on warming and promoting investment in alternative energy.

It was Paulson who encouraged the former oil executives in the West Wing to embrace ambitious targets to cut by 20 percent the amount of gas Americans are forecast to consume by 2017 (part of the plan outlined in Bush's State of the Union). Of course, now they just have to tell us HOW to do that!

via MSNBC

The Bush Administration is going down in history as the Worst Environmental President according to the NRDC, Global Warming poster boy (and hopefully Presidential Candidate for 2008) Al Gore and many, many other respected organizations.

If you want to learn more, be sure to check out:
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.'s wonderful accounting entitled Crimes Against Nature.

Edward Flattau's piercing analysis of the Bush Adminsitration in Peering Through The Bushes.

Bush Greenwatch is a project of Friends of the Earth which provides information on the Bush Administration's assault on our environment and public health.

Labels:

Tuesday, January 30, 2007

Bush officials misled public on global warming

James Hansen, chief climate scientist for NASA reported over a year ago that the Bush administration tried to stop him from speaking out calling for prompt reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases linked to global warming.

Hearing things like this shows the divide between politics and what is in the Public's best interest.

But now this story about the investigation into the deliberate attempts by the Bush Administration to create doubt about Global Warming just reminds me how much this is true.

Apparently, 40 percent of the 279 climate scientists who responded to a White House questionnaire complained that some of their scientific papers had been edited in a way that changed their meaning. Nearly half of the 279 said in response to another question that at some point they had been told to delete reference to "global warming" or "climate change" from a report.

Full Story at Associated Press

Labels: ,

Sunday, January 28, 2007

Why Gore Should Run...

Rolling Stone has a great piece on why Al Gore should run for President in 2008.

History in the making:
A stiff vice president campaigns on his administration's legacy of unprecedented prosperity.
Looks terrible on TV.
Bows out, following a disputed vote count.
Then, two terms later, with no incumbent in the race, he re-enters the fray.
Promises to change the course of a disastrous war founded on lies.
And charges to victory. I'm referring, of course, to the 1968 campaign of Richard Milhous Nixon.
But four decades later, history has a chance to repeat itself for Albert Arnold Gore.


After all, Gore was right about the War, right about Global Warming, and won the 2000 election. Will he run?

Labels: ,

Wednesday, November 08, 2006

Environment: not a Democratic issue

Whenever I am outside of San Francisco, I often have to remind myself to not be so vocal about my more liberal opinions. After all, we are quite spoiled here in the "bastion of liberalism" as many have called it. I was booed once when giving a lecture and forgetting my location, both cultural and geographic, assuming everyone in the audience shared my distaste for the current administration.

But when it comes to the environment, I am even more particular to avoid any connection with politics. The worst thing one could do for the environmental movement would be to try to attach it to a specific political party. As RFK. Jr. says, "There are no Republican children or Democratic children."

The environment MUST be seen as the only truly bi-partisan issue. It is not just in the domain of the Democrats, but should be the concern of everyone. Why else would the Republicans call themselves Conservatives if they are not conserving our planet.

So now, post election, we can start to see how the Republicans should no longer ignore the environment. Just ask Republican Rep. Richard Pombo of California whose openly hostile approach to the environment cost him is seven term seat in the House. Maybe if he wasn't chairman of the House Resources Committee, which writes environmental laws, it would not have been such a big deal.

Perhaps surprises like this will show all politicians how protecting our environmental future is the responsibility of ALL government.

Full Story

Labels:

Monday, August 28, 2006

What price freedom?

The National Priorities Project has a real eye-opening website that calculates the cost of the War in Iraq and them compares it to what we could do with that money.

As a resident of California, here’s what they say we could be doing:

Taxpayers in California will pay $40.3 billion for the cost of war in Iraq. For the same amount of money, the following could have been provided:

* 16,733,296 People with Health Care or
* 627,551 Elementary School Teachers or
* 4,767,634 Head Start Places for Children or
* 25,168,314 Children with Health Care or
* 235,246 Affordable Housing Units or
* 4,390 New Elementary Schools or
* 7,685,109 Scholarships for University Students or
* 616,017 Music and Arts Teachers or
* 741,482 Public Safety Officers or
* 117,140,845 Homes with Renewable Electricity or
* 601,790 Port Container Inspectors

Go check out what the trade-offs are for your state..

Labels:

Thursday, August 24, 2006

Bush: Desparate Soundbites

Not to get too political, but this Daily Show clip is self-explanatory.

Bush has a revelation, "Killing innocent people is bad."

But then:
BUSH: "...the terrorists attacked us and killed 3000 of our citizens..."
REPORTER: "What does Iraq have to do with 9/11?"
BUSH: "Nothing!!"

Watch:

Labels: ,

Friday, July 07, 2006

George W. Bush Is Dead To Me

Mark Morford wrote a great column today on George W. Bush... but global warming crept in as another black mark for the Bush Administration.

An excerpt:
..how obvious it is that 15 minutes after BushCo leaves office, we will have a radically new global warming policy. In other words, Bush won't do a thing about it in the next two years, despite how obvious it shall become that we are in crisis, simply because he can't risk finally coming out and admitting yet another enormous policy disaster. Not to mention how nearly six years of enviro policy abuse, from air quality to water to forestry to pollution deregulation on all his industrial pals, can't be undone with a smirk and a prayer.

Which is just another way of saying we are currently stuck...


Stolen elections, countless scandals, corporate favoritism... you cannot abuse Americans like that forever. Unfortunately for the world, the global warming issue is not immune to politics. After all, the US is only 4% of the world's population, but produces 65% of the world's greenhouse gases. If our President ignores the issue, we affect a large piece of the world by doing so.

Labels:

Wednesday, June 28, 2006

Al Gore on Futurama

Here is a great clip from one of my favorite shows, Futurama (Comedy Central just annouced they are making 13 new episodes). Al Gore discusses his new film and the global climate crisis. Gore's daughter, Kristin, is one of the writers of the show.



I am not sure if having a sense of humor about global climate change is helpful or hurtful. The oil companies seem to be spreading lies about The Inconvenient Truth , maybe all we can do is laugh.

Labels: ,

Sunday, May 14, 2006

If Only Al Gore was President


Al Gore opened Saturday Night Live last night with an Oval Office address to the nation that assumed we did not have a criminal Supreme Court in 2000 and that he has been president for the last six years. You really need to watch this clip.

An excerpt:
Right now, in the 2nd week of May 2006, we are facing perhaps the worst gas crisis in history.
We have way too much gasoline. Gas is down to $0.19 a gallon and the oil companies are hurting.
I know that I am partly to blame by insisting that cars run on trash.
I am therefore proposing a federal bailout to our oil companies because - hey if it were the other way around, you know the oil companies would help us...

Labels: ,

Tuesday, April 25, 2006

Al Gore Editorial in WSJ

For People and Planet
When will companies start accounting for environmental costs?
BY AL GORE

Capitalism and sustainability are deeply and increasingly interrelated. After all, our economic activity is based on the use of natural and human resources. Not until we more broadly "price in" the external costs of investment decisions across all sectors will we have a sustainable economy and society.

FIULL STORY

Labels: ,

Sunday, April 16, 2006

Al Gore's New Film on Global Warming

An Inconvenient Truth eloquently weaves the science of global warming with Gore's personal history and lifelong commitment to reversing the effects of global climate change.
Having heard him speak about this, I can tell you this is a new, passionate Al Gore, the one I had HOPED to see in the 2000 election.

INFO: climatecrisis.net

Oh, and the trailer will give you chills.

Labels: ,

Tuesday, September 06, 2005

United States of Shame
NYT's Maureen Dowd writes with her usual brilliance:

Shirt-sleeves rolled up, W. finally landed in Hell yesterday and chuckled about his wild boozing days in "the great city" of N'Awlins. He was clearly moved. "You know, I'm going to fly out of here in a minute," he said on the runway at the New Orleans International Airport, "but I want you to know that I'm not going to forget what I've seen." Out of the cameras' range, and avoided by W., was a convoy of thousands of sick and dying people, some sprawled on the floor or dumped on baggage carousels at a makeshift M*A*S*H unit inside the terminal.

Why does this self-styled "can do" president always lapse into such lame "who could have known?" excuses?


READ THE ARTICLE

Labels:

Saturday, September 03, 2005

Worst President Ever?
So, what can we say about this President? This golden boy.

He’s crippled the economy.

He’s decimated our educational system.

He’s given billions to the rich in terms of tax cuts.

He’s given billions to Halliburton via “no bid” contracts in both Iraq and Afghanistan.

He’s eviscerated environmental laws.

He’s allowed the biggest terrorist attack on US soil in history.

He’s launched an illegal, illogical, invasion of a country that wasn’t a threat to America using bogus intelligence claims, costing the lives of tens of thousands of innocents.

He’s revived a billion dollar boondoggle of a “Star Wars” missile defense system…that doesn’t work.

He’s racked up record deficits, while preaching financial conservatism.

He’s created the biggest governmental bureaucracy in history.

He’s stifled dissent and free speech.

He’s isolated himself from real people as would a monarch.

His minions have castrated FEMA, a once effective agency, not only folding it into Homeland Security but appointing leaders who have no experience in disaster relief but were big Bush campaign contributors.

And, while he’s ignored and denied the science that points to intense climate change because of global warming, we’ve been hit by record hurricane seasons.

God doesn’t even seem to like Bush’s America, anymore.

So, maybe God is one of us, after all.

I hope God gets into saving lives in New Orleans and the Gulf Coast pronto.

Because, apparently, the Bush Administration can’t.

READ ON

Labels:

Tuesday, August 02, 2005

Top Ten George W. Bush Solutions For Global Warming
David Letterman, The Late Show (CBS)

10. NASA mission to turn down the sun's thermostat

9. Federal subsidies to boost production of Cool Ranch Doritos

8. Fast track Rumsfeld's "Colonize Neptune" proposal

7. Convene Blue-Ribbon Committee to explore innovative ways of ignoring the problem

6. Let Hillary worry about it when she takes over

5. I dunno---tax cuts for the rich?

4. Give the boys at Halliburton 90-billion dollar contract to patch hole in ozone

3. Switch to celsius so scorching 98 becomes frosty 37

2. Keep plenty of Bud on ice

1. Invade Antartica

Labels: ,

Thursday, June 30, 2005

Bush Administration Manipulates Science in Grazing Report
The Bush Administration manipulated scientific data in a
government study on the environmental impact of cattle grazing
prior to announcing that it would loosen regulations limiting
grazing on public lands, according to two scientists who
contributed to the study.

READ THE ARTICLE

Labels: ,

Bush: Kyoto Would Have 'Wrecked' Economy
President Bush said in a Danish TV interview aired Thursday that adhering to the Kyoto treaty on climate change would have "wrecked" the U.S. economy, and he called U.S. dependence on Gulf oil a "national security problem."

READ THE ARTICLE

Labels: ,

Monday, February 21, 2005

The cost of war


Labels: